Trump and Canada as 51st state
Dec. 29th, 2024 07:59 amIonel posts meme of road sign with "Welcome to CANADA: We don't have S. Africans telling us what to do".
Sean mumbles something about the scenario in which Canada becomes the 51st state.
Ionel: You are right: there is a non-zero chance that Canada could become the 51st state and if that shit-show does happen, a South African telling us what to do is probably not going to be even in the top 5 list of my worries 🙂 If that happens, I will likely activate my EU citizenship and keep it on standby just in case...
Sean: I’m really hoping Congress is rethinking that War Powers Act thing. Just when you think he couldn’t come up with something even more unimaginable…
Ionel: Well, after taking the Gish Gallop to new heights, and elevating its use to the real world on Jan 6 (by reversing its implications while rewriting history), the Stable-Orange-Genius-Giving-Young Simps-Order-Cum-Kicking is (in)advertently expanding its uses in the realm of statecraft as well.
As to the War Powers Act of 1973, presidents have 60 or 90 days to use military force without Congressional authorization. One could argue, that neither limitation applies to Canada, Panama or Greenland, as they could all be sacked or cowed in less than 14, 7 and 1 day respectively. If by some remote chance, more time is needed, POTUS could hit pause on his military "maneuvers", reset the game clock and start over as many times as needed and/or transfer command to its patsy NATO as Obama/HRC have done in 2011 in Libya and/or simply ignore or veto any Congressional performative attempt to block his actions, as ALL presidents have done since 1973 whenever they needed more than 60 days to clean up whatever military "activity" they started all on their own.
As to strengthening Congress' war powers, some might argue that Congress has done the opposite in 2002 with AUMF (which is increasingly used to run over the comatose WPA) and more importantly, that Congress has virtually no backbone or legal muscle on taking on POTUS, especially the incoming one given the MAGA-style GOP spine self-removal or that it has any clue on how to circumvent SCOTUS from laying down even more decisions to bolster its quid-pro-quo decades-long unitary executive theory course.
Sean mumbles something about the scenario in which Canada becomes the 51st state.
Ionel: You are right: there is a non-zero chance that Canada could become the 51st state and if that shit-show does happen, a South African telling us what to do is probably not going to be even in the top 5 list of my worries 🙂 If that happens, I will likely activate my EU citizenship and keep it on standby just in case...
Sean: I’m really hoping Congress is rethinking that War Powers Act thing. Just when you think he couldn’t come up with something even more unimaginable…
Ionel: Well, after taking the Gish Gallop to new heights, and elevating its use to the real world on Jan 6 (by reversing its implications while rewriting history), the Stable-Orange-Genius-Giving-Young Simps-Order-Cum-Kicking is (in)advertently expanding its uses in the realm of statecraft as well.
As to the War Powers Act of 1973, presidents have 60 or 90 days to use military force without Congressional authorization. One could argue, that neither limitation applies to Canada, Panama or Greenland, as they could all be sacked or cowed in less than 14, 7 and 1 day respectively. If by some remote chance, more time is needed, POTUS could hit pause on his military "maneuvers", reset the game clock and start over as many times as needed and/or transfer command to its patsy NATO as Obama/HRC have done in 2011 in Libya and/or simply ignore or veto any Congressional performative attempt to block his actions, as ALL presidents have done since 1973 whenever they needed more than 60 days to clean up whatever military "activity" they started all on their own.
As to strengthening Congress' war powers, some might argue that Congress has done the opposite in 2002 with AUMF (which is increasingly used to run over the comatose WPA) and more importantly, that Congress has virtually no backbone or legal muscle on taking on POTUS, especially the incoming one given the MAGA-style GOP spine self-removal or that it has any clue on how to circumvent SCOTUS from laying down even more decisions to bolster its quid-pro-quo decades-long unitary executive theory course.