![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Apparently, speaker Johnson does not support a war power resolution bill because he is a spineless ass-kisser with the memory of a goldfish:
I mean, why would Congress not continue its over half-century streak to shirk its constitutional duties to be the sole arbiter of the nation's war making when it can derogate that power to a diaper-wearing addle-brained psychopathic octogenarian who was dragged into a potential WW3 by two psychopathic genocidal Middle Eastern leaders and who has already all but declared "Mission Accomplished" when he put an expiry clock on the Iran (not)War affair of max four weeks?
“I think the idea that we would move a War Powers Act vote right now, I mean, it will be forced to the floor, but the idea that we would take the ability of our commander in chief, the president, take his authority away right now to finish this job, is a frightening prospect to me,” Johnson told reporters after a briefing on the operation.
“It’s dangerous, and I am certainly hopeful, and I believe we do have the votes to put it down. That’s going to be a good thing for the country and our security and stability,” he added.
I mean, why would Congress not continue its over half-century streak to shirk its constitutional duties to be the sole arbiter of the nation's war making when it can derogate that power to a diaper-wearing addle-brained psychopathic octogenarian who was dragged into a potential WW3 by two psychopathic genocidal Middle Eastern leaders and who has already all but declared "Mission Accomplished" when he put an expiry clock on the Iran (not)War affair of max four weeks?
