The Big Bang and “leaky” black holes, stars and comets are primordial chaos seeders that eventually allowed life (a temporary semi-chaotic unstable cycle) to spring from nothing. All our creation myths obscure this universal truth to various degrees (e.g. Greek, Abrahamic and other myths by anthropomorphizing the beginning, and quickly moving on to a human relatable soap opera of increasing complexity that strongly obscures our beginning and eventually our end as well, e.g. by presenting a non-chaotic and unrealistic end: Heaven/hell, Hades/Olympus, Valhalla, reincarnation/nirvana, etc). Hindu eschatology (see Kalki) is probably the closest to the truth: universal cycles of varying chaos (from absolute chaos such as the Big Bang to relative periods of aparent order such as now).

Our present is mainly built on assuming that chaos is rare which is the reason that war, natural calamities and other black swan events are poorly codified and managed. Conversely, domains in which chaos (also called risk) is more common usually generate outsized profits (e.g. war, insurance schemes) and domains in which chaos is less common generate less profit (e.g. individual and national mortgages which are perceived as low risk). There is always a gap between actual risk and expected risk and this gap is a profit generator when gauged correctly and a chaos enhancer otherwise (e.g. subprime crisis, sovereign defaults).

Our future will definitely see more chaos: climate change, natural calamities, wars, pestilence, tech singularity and ultimately for Earth, our star’s demise. I just hope that we get better at recognizing and accounting for all the chaos around us and especially the chaos we produce ourselves.

LE: Via a map purported to be the first world map, a map attributed to Anaximander which divides the world into Europe, Asia and Libya, I was reacquainted with Anaximander and his apeiron, the concept of nothingness from which everything springs again and again and to which everything always returns to as well (a sort of primordial black hole). So, I searched Anaximander on FB and most hits were a context-less simulacra of his map, a few pictures of (his) sundials and even fewer mentions of his philosophy and his apeiron. The exercise reminded me of the repetition of human history, actions and dialogues as well as the decay of ideas and philosophies into their most digestible and easy to grasp parts to the point of illegibility and v’gerism (i.e. cargo cultism). Nașpa sexo-marxist wookieness, eh?

LE2: Some humans inject varying degrees of chaos into human society as well, some more successfully than others (e.g. prophets, emperors, dictators, leaders of powerful nations or organizations). As of the last few decades, it appears that entropy is uptrending due to human and/or climate activity, but we need not fear as the AI singularity is upon us to save us from ourselves and the only unknown is whether it will take the form of a cyborg(s) takeover, Colossus, or some other permutation. Of course, there are other cheery scenarios: the simulation hypothesis, a hard-to-predict alien invasion (or a galactic h2g2 scenario), self-destruction through MAD or some other unforeseen calamity.
There are some who think AI will save us from ourselves (e.g. Kai-Fu Lee), others that think it will inevitably lead to a technological singularity (see Virge's 1998 article) whose event horizon is not too distant (see Kurzweil's 2045 prediction) and some that see AI as just another religion (see Keas' Unbelievable book). Cutting through all these different interpretations, there is a brewing meaning crisis which I have serious doubts that AI will provide a cogent or even partial solution to.

I recently quipped: "AI is starting to look more and more like the archetypal golem it was destined to be. Yes, it will get better at hiding its flaws, but deep at its core, it will always be a golem through which humans will project their best and worst traits and dreams." To this (in the context of ChatGPT), the response (from an AI groupie who has since blocked me on FB as I was repeatedly harshing his FB mellow with other AI groupies) was to read about smart people failing the AI mirror test.
Există unii care cred că IA ne va salva de noi înșine (de exemplu, Kai-Fu Lee), alții care cred că va duce inevitabil la o singularitate tehnologică (vezi articolul lui Virge din 1998) al cărei orizont de evenimente nu este prea îndepărtat (vezi predicția lui Kurzweil 2045) și unii care văd IA ca doar o altă religie (vezi cartea Incredibil a lui Keas). Trecând peste toate aceste interpretări diferite, există o criză a semnificațiilor (în creștere), la care am serioase îndoieli că IA va oferi o soluție convingătoare sau chiar parțială.

Am glumit (parțial) recent: „IA începe să semene din ce în ce mai mult cu golemul arhetipal care a fost destinat să fie. Da, va deveni mai bine să-și ascundă defectele, dar în adâncul său, va fi întotdeauna un golem prin care oamenii vor proiecta cele mai bune și cele mai rele trăsături și vise ale lor.” La aceasta (în contextul ChatGPT), răspunsul a fost să citesc despre oamenii inteligenți care au eșuat testul oglinzii IA.
Yesterday, we picked up a grocery shopping list at Fortinos that M ordered 2 weeks ago. The young woman placed it in the trunk so it was contactless if you don't count the indirect contact through the bags. It was eerie.

We also watched the Season 1 finale of Westworld: a bit of reverse Matrix [robot] consciousness awakening and von Neumann's Singularity memes weaved in. Robert Ford's monologues are balm to a stoic's heart. Here is another good gem from a few episodes back:

There is no threshold that makes us greater than the sum of our parts, no inflection point at which we become fully alive. We can’t define consciousness because consciousness does not exist. Humans fancy that there’s something special about the way we perceive the world, and yet we live in loops as tight and as closed as the hosts do, seldom questioning our choices, content, for the most part, to be told what to do next.

I also watched a Diego Maradona doc. It was poignant and brought back memories of watching my first FIFA World Cup finals and the infamous Argentina QF Hand of God goal as well as the most brilliant goal ever by the same player. It was painful the watch Diego's ensnarement by the Camorra in his Napoli time, the deep divisions between Italy's North and South and how Diego was back stabbed multiple times after his team's 1990 finals elimination of hosts Italy. It was also sad to watch how time has taken a heavy toll on the man, but bittersweet to see him acknowledging his illegitimate son after 30 years of denial.

PS: I forgot to mention finding a few days ago about a controversial poet, Bukowski, from my primary school homeroom and lit teacher and principal. He was quite the flawed character and kindred spirit to Baudelaire and Apollinaire.

Profile

JMA-PSOS

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 234 56
78 9 1011 12 13
14 151617 181920
21 222324 2526 27
28 29 30 31   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 11:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios